RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04402
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 12 February 1972, he received urgent medical care at the 3rd
Field Hospital in Saigon, Republic of Vietnam, as a result of a
stabbing wound by an unknown combatant. He was stabbed in the
abdomen and was hospitalized from 12 February 1972 to 28
February 1972.
In support of the applicants appeal he submits documents
extracted from his military personnel records and a letter from
the Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 25 May 1970.
On 15 February 1974, the applicant was honorably released from
active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He served
3 years, 8 months and 21 days on active duty. He was credited
with 1 year of foreign and/or sea service.
The PH is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces
who have been wounded, killed, or who have died or may hereafter
die of wounds received in action against an enemy of the United
States or opposing force as a result of an act of any such enemy
or opposing armed force, an international terrorist attack or
during military operations while serving as a part of a
peacekeeping force. A wound for which the award is made must
have required treatment, not merely examination, by a medical
officer. Additionally, treatment of the wound shall be
documented in the service members medical and/or health record.
Award of the PH may be made for wounds treated by a medical
professional other than a medical officer, provided a medical
officer includes a statement in the service members medical
record that the extent of the wounds were such that they would
have required treatment by a medical officer if one had been
available to treat them.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. DPSID states after a thorough
review of the applicant's official military personnel record,
they were unable to verify award of the PH.
The applicant states he was stabbed in the abdomen by an unknown
combatant. The applicant provided a Statement of Medical
Examination and Duty Status (DA Form 2173) verifying he was
medically treated for wounds received while leaving a bar on or
about 0030 on 12 February 1972 at Tan Son Nhut, Vietnam. The
document further states the applicant was stabbed in the abdomen
by a member of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam.
The PH Review Board has the authority (on behalf of the
Secretary of the Air Force), to determine a veteran's award of
the PH. Each request is considered based on the policies and
criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the
determination is dependent on the documentary evidence
presented.
The PH Review Board considered the applicant's request and
disapproved award of the Purple Heart on 4 March 2014 due to the
applicant not meeting the requirements for award of the Purple
Heart.
While the applicant's service is appreciated, based on the
documentation available the applicant's injury was by a member
of an allied force, Army of the Republic of Vietnam, and not a
result of enemy action. To grant relief would be contrary to
the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, the Secretary of the
Air Force, Chief of Staff, and/or the War Department.
The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
SAF/MRBP recommends denial. MRBP states after a review of the
applicants records and submitted supporting documents, they
concur with AFPC/DPSID in recommending disapproval of the PH.
The applicants injury does not meet the criteria for award of
the PH.
The MRBP complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 15 May 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within
30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The
applicants contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing
the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of AFPC/DPSID and SAF/MRBP and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
provided sufficient evidence to substantiate his entitlement to
the PH. Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-04402 in Executive Session on 24 June 2014, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 September 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. DD Form 214, AF Form 7, Airman Performance
Reports and a Report of Medical Examination.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 11 April 2014.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBP, dated 29 April 2014.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 2014.
4
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03961
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for the award of the PH Medal, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation substantiating he received an injury...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01096
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. There is no provided evidence that the decedent was awarded the PH, or he received medical documentation substantiating an injury that required medical treatment. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03043
When he returned from deployment, he received additional X-rays and an MRI for his right leg and left shoulder. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has twice applied to the United States Air Forces Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03723
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Purple Heart medal. After a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record, no documentation was found to verify award of the Purple Heart Medal. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02728
The PH was submitted through the Army; however, he has now been instructed to resubmit through the Air Force since he was in the Air Force during the timeframe in question. In support of his request, the applicant provided as evidence the following: Memorandum Award of the Purple Heart, dated 31 Jan 14, DA Form 4187 Personnel Action, copies of three DD Form 214s, copy of his Officer Record Brief, Operation ENDURING FREEDOM Contingency, Exercise and Deployment Orders,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00130
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received shrapnel wounds in his arms and legs during a rescue mission on 3 Apr 72 at Cam Lo, Vietnam. The AFGCM w/4BOLC to read Air Force Good Conduct Medal with one Silver Oak Leaf Cluster (AFGCM w/1SOLC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05166
(Will be administratively corrected) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was insufficient data at the time his DD Form 214 was prepared. Should the applicant provide the additional documentation requested by AFCENT, he can then be considered for award of the PH. Therefore, aside from the administrative corrections to award the AFCM and the AFCAM, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the additional relief sought...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00035
The Board should consider his request and award him the PH because he heard of a few guys who received the PH and did not have an injury. The applicant's request cannot be considered by the PH Review Board unless there is a detailed personal account of how the injury occurred, medical documentation substantiating treatment was received, and eyewitness statements. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03636
Special Order Number AC-41295 reflects the applicant was relieved from active duty on 27 December 1972 and placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) on 28 December 1972 in the grade of airman first class. On 8 December 2014, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that after a complete review of his official military record and the documentation he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time at Phan Rang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00097
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of the members official military records and the documentation submitted by the applicant did not reveal any evidence that the applicant qualified for award of the PH. THE...